cw: my actual penis. if you click this, you will be looking at a penis. this is not a joke
me, opening every cw I see without thinking "man, what the hell, I didn't want to look at a penis"
more than I'd like to admit tbh
my triggle discipline with CWs isn't always as good as it should be tbh. also people could stand to be less vague with them sometimes >.>
@BestGirlGrace (not even saying that to slam people that post nudes or whatever, they're fine and totally valid, tbh.)
Me: that CW is really gross, def something I will not enjoy seeing. It was considerate of them to warn me so I can avoid it.
@Taweret "Well, now I have to see what it is."
if im interested, thats good,
interested and confused is better,
interested confused and scandalized is great,
interested confused and slightly concerned is like somehow what my brain thinks is grade AA content but ends up making me sad or upset,
and anything that really offputs me usually gets me to go whoa no not clicking that thank You for tagging
at least 40% of the time anyway vOv
@BestGirlGrace I feel like the CW tag is overused and abused in mastodon and as a result people will click all of them, leading to the effect kind of being dulled
@violet @sydia I feel like part of the real value of CWs is that it encourages people to tag their posts for things that folks might want to mute. When I was trying to avoid Deltarune spoilers, muting "deltarune" and "delta rune" was a lot more effective because the cw system encouraged people to tag their posts.
@ben Whoa, that’s kinda exactly what I was looking for tbh. Just wish Toot! had something like that.
Don't let the name fool you. All the pornography here is legal, and much of it is hand-written. No fascists, no bigots.